Categories
Archives
- September 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
Blogroll
Monthly Archives: July 2008
Financial Lies from Merrill
After the close on July 17th, Merrill Lynch announced earnings. Actually it wasn’t earnings, because they lost money. They lost $4.65 billion on writedowns. On the 18th, the stock rebounded from earlier losses and closed slightly higher for the day on hopes and beliefs that the worst was over and that financial stocks had put in a bottom.
Today after the close, not two weeks from reporting their financial results, Merrill announced they were going to take another $5.7 billion writedown of assets and raise $8.5 billion in stock.
Are you kidding me? Is it any wonder that no one trusts the financial numbers or balance sheets of any of these financial companies? They are simply all lies. They are basically putting off markdowns and writeoffs whenever they want. And they are stringing it out to make it not seem as bad as it really is.
The hits and the writeoffs will keep coming until all of this toxic stuff is priced properly. And how can you tell if they are finally telling you the truth? Who knows.
Jewish Perfection
Perfection is definitely not a Jewish thought or attribute. Consider the patriarchs of Judaism such as Noah who gets drunk, Jacob who steals his brother’s birthright by misleading his father Isaac, and even Moses, the greatest of all Jews, speaks with a lisp and disobeys God. And we could have a field day talking about King David. All of these people are examples of the far from perfect and flawed heroes that God talks, communicates and makes promises to in the Tanakh (Jewish bible).
Beyond individuals, the Jewish people as a whole are definitely not perfect. One immediately remembers the “Golden Calf” incident or other times when the Jews as a “stiff-necked people” disobeyed or did not listen to God. And yet isn’t it curious that despite not being perfect, we are still the Chosen people?
Why both on an individual and group level does God communicate and make a covenant with a people that is not perfect, but sometimes deeply flawed?
I believe the answer lies in the story of the wine steward and the baker who were in Pharaoh’s jail with Joseph (He was thrown in there for being falsely accused by Potifar’s wife. Genesis 39)
The baker was in there because the Pharaoh found a stone in a loaf of bread and the wine steward was in the dungeon because a fly was found in the wine glass of Pharaoh. The subsequent fates of the two are instructive, the wine steward is freed and is reinstated to his former position and the baker is put to death. Why?
The Rabbi of Ishbitz (Chassidic Rabbi around 1840 in Poland) teaches that the baker was aiming for perfection, and tried to keep all of the bad stuff that could come into the bread from getting in, while the wine steward knew there was only so much that he control and that once he poured the wine, a fly could fly into it and there was nothing he could do about it.
In this story is the proof text that perfection is not the goal of Judaism or God. The Ishbitzer Rebbe tells us that the experience of life is God, so therefore God is the fly in your wine cup. Perfection is not the goal of life, life is the goal of life and experiencing it with all of its ups and down is the experience of God.
The baker on the other hand is completely unprepared for when something bad happens. His goal is perfection, so what happens when a stone gets into a loaf of bread, the baker dies. To the wine steward the baker’s stone is like the fly, something that happens and is part of the experience of life. But to the baker, a fly in the wine cup is a stone, something that is unacceptable, a mark of imperfection and something to fight against. In the end, the wine steward triumphs and lives and the baker dies.
And this highlights why perfection is not a Jewish ideal. Without the mistakes and the problems, or the flies and stones in our lives, how would we ever learn, grow and evolve into deeper, more aware and stronger people? And this is what Judaism teaches us, that when bad stuff that happens, when flies land in our wine cup, they are part of life and a part of God. The sooner we learn to accept the slings and arrows of life and realize we will never be perfect, the stronger we will be and the better people we will become.
This isn’t to mean that you shouldn’t strive to be a good person or be the best of your abilities, but that instead you recognize that shit happens. A favorite country singer of mine, Pat Green, says it best:
Wouldn’t life be awfully boring,
If the good times were all that we had?
If there was a Jewish perfection it would rest on learning to appreciate the flies and stones in our lives along our brief but wonderful journey and to try as much as possible to use them to our advantage and to see the Godliness and holiness in them.
Shabbat Shalom.
*This blog posting is heavily influenced and taught to me by Rabbi Avi Poupko from Pardes
Where was Moses?
Where was Moses when God gave the Ten Commandments?
Before I answer that easy question, its important to read what specifically happens before God reveals the Ten Commandments at Mt. Sinai. Basically, an eighty-year-old Moses goes up and down Mt. Sinai four times to communicate with God and the people of Israel. Why all the schlepping up and down the mountain for an old man? In one of my classes Marc Rosenberg, a teacher at Pardes (Pardes Link) where I’m studying, taught that it shows that before having a spiritual experience with God, you need to do a lot of preparation and a lot of work.
Now back to my original question: where was Moses when God revealed the Ten Commandments? Moses was actually at the bottom of Mt. Sinai with everyone else.
Wait, what?
There it is in Exodus 19 Verse 20, Moses “went to down to the people and spoke to them.” The very next sentence in Verse 20, is God speaking and giving the Ten Commandments.
Marc Rosenberg taught that it was God’s “Plan A” to make a mass revelation. In other words, Moses was no higher than anyone else at Sinai, everyone was at the same level. But that didn’t work. The people freaked out and they fall back at the approach of God and beg Moses to go up and talk to God for them. Too much thunder and lightning can scare people I guess.
So God embarks on “Plan B”, that is he tells Moses and Moses will be the conduit for the people of Israel. But this proves to be problematic because what do people do when Moses isn’t around. They build a Golden Calf.
So, the essence of Marc’s teaching is that God’s original plan is that everyone can have a strong connection to God. Unfortunately, it takes a lot of work, i.e. climbing up and down the mountain, and most people don’t want that. More than that, they are afraid of it. So instead, people push forward “Moses type of people” to communicate with God for them such as Rabbis, Priests, Monks and others. It’s much, much easier to have someone else do the spiritual work for you.
But if you have someone else doing your spiritual work for you, you will find that you have distanced yourself from God and your connection isn’t very strong and its very, very easy build Golden Calves.
While Rome Burns
Apparently I’m not the only one outraged at the incompetence of not only Wall Street but every government official possible. The problem with the state of our economy is leverage and greed. And Congress and every other government official wants to blame speculators, senators and rumors. It is extremely sad that not one government official is standing up and telling everyone that the Emperors (The Fed and Bernanke, our financial system in its current state, and Financial stocks such as Fannie Mae) have no clothes.
But don’t listen to me, listen to Barry Ritholz, who nails it in this post:
Voyage
This is one of the best things I’ve ever read:
To be truly challenging, a voyage, like a life, must rest on a firm foundation of financial unrest. Otherwise you are doomed to a routine traverse, the kind known to yachtsmen, who play with their boats at sea–”cruising”, it is called. Voyaging belongs to seamen, and to the wanderers of the world who cannot, or will not, fit in. If you are contemplating a voyage and you have the means, abandon the venture until your fortunes change. Only then will you know what the sea is all about.
Little has been said or written about the ways a man may blast himself free. Why? I don’t know, unless the answer lies in our diseased values. A man seldom hesitates to describe his work; he gladly divulges the privacies of alleged sexual conquests. But ask him how much he has in the bank and he recoils into a shocked and stubborn silence.
“I’ve always wanted to sail to the South Seas, but I can’t afford it.” What these men can’t afford is not to go. They are enmeshed in the cancerous discipline of “security”. And in the worship of security we fling our lives beneath the wheels of routine—and before we know it our lives are gone.
What does a man need—really need? A few pounds of food each day, heat and shelter, six feet to lie down in—and some form of working activity that will yield a sense of accomplishment. That’s all—in the material sense. And we know it. But we are brainwashed by our economic system until we end up beneath a pyramid of time payments, mortgages, preposterous gadgetry, playthings that divert our attention from the sheer idiocy of the charade.
The years thunder by. The dreams of youth grow dim where they lie caked in dust on the shelves of patience. Before we know it, the tomb is sealed.
Where, then, lies the answer? In choice. Which shall it be: bankruptcy of purse or bankruptcy of life?
I got the above from Paul Kedrosky’s blog, Infectious Greed. It is from the book, The Wanderer, by Sterling Hayden.
Here is the link:
Sir John Templeton
Sir John Templeton, one of the great investors of all time, has died at age 95. He was a great influence on me as a young kid trying to learn about investing. Not only was he a great investor, he was a great human being. Below is a link to an old Wall Street Week interview and a Wall Street Journal obituary.
Wall Street Week with Louis Ruykeyser with Sir John Templeton
Wall Street Journal
Fund Pioneer Templeton Dies
By JONATHAN BURTON
July 9, 2008; Page C17
SAN FRANCISCO – Sir John Templeton, the legendary mutual-fund manager who was a pioneer of international investing and later committed much of his fortune to scientific and religious causes, died Tuesday. He was 95.
Over the course of a Wall Street career that began in 1937 and spanned more than five decades, Sir John earned a reputation for prescient, bargain-minded stock selection that consistently rewarded shareholders in his Templeton Funds family.
In 1999, Money Magazine called Sir John “arguably the greatest global stock picker of the century.” A $10,000 investment in the storied Templeton Growth Fund in 1954 would have grown to $2 million by 1992, when Sir John sold his company to Franklin Resources, the San Mateo, Calif.-based fund giant, for $913 million. That translates to an annualized 14.5% return.
Charles Johnson, Franklin’s chairman, said in a written statement, “Even at our first in-person meeting in 1992, when we discussed the potential merger between our companies, I quickly realized that John was a man of principle, determination, intelligence and wisdom. His brilliance as an investor was second to none.”
Sir John, who lived in the Bahamas and was a naturalized British citizen, died at Doctors Hospital in Nassau. The cause was pneumonia, according to a statement that the John Templeton Foundation, his charitable organization, posted on its Web site.
Uncommon Investor
Early in his investing career, Sir John showed that he was willing to take roads less traveled. He extolled the wisdom of buying superior stocks at what he called points of “maximum pessimism” in order to take advantage of temporarily low prices. He applied that strategy to countries, industries and companies, displaying a rare ability among investment professionals to avoid following the crowd.
“He was one of a kind,” said Martin Flanagan, chief executive of mutual-fund company Invesco Ltd., in a telephone interview. Mr. Flanagan was director, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Templeton, Galbraith & Hansberger, Ltd. before its acquisition by Franklin.
“He was probably one of the biggest free thinkers in our industry,” added Flanagan, who joined Franklin as chief financial officer after the acquisition and in 2004 became its president and co-chief executive.
“He led very quietly through deep, thoughtful analysis and engaged in very broad conversation and really challenged perspectives that are not common,” Flanagan said of Templeton. “He would be asking the question or putting you in the direction that few would ever think of.”
It was Sir John’s embrace of international markets at a time when most Americans wouldn’t consider such investments that truly set him apart. Templeton Growth, introduced in 1954, was among the first mutual funds to invest in companies based outside of the U.S. Siblings Templeton World Fund and Templeton Developing Markets Fund, with its globetrotting manager Mark Mobius, also earned accolades.
“Remain flexible and open-minded about types of investment,” Sir John advised investors in a 1993 article, “16 Rules for Investment Success.” Among his other aphorisms: “Invest — don’t trade or speculate”; “Diversify. In stocks and bonds, as in much else, there is safety in numbers,” and “Do not be fearful or negative too often.”
Religious Devotion
John Marks Templeton was born Nov. 29, 1912 in the small town of Winchester, Tenn. He graduated from Yale University in 1934 near the top of his class and was named a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford. After completing his studies at Oxford he set off on a world tour that exposed him to many countries and cultures before returning to the U.S. and a job on Wall Street.
When World War II began in 1939, Sir John put that global experience into practice. He borrowed money to buy 100 shares each of 104 companies selling at $1 a share or less, including 34 companies that were in bankruptcy, according to a posting on the Templeton Foundation’s Web site. Sir John held each stock for an average of four years, and only four turned out to be worthless.
Mr. Flanagan, the Invesco executive, recalled that Sir John exhibited a similar conviction during the 1987 stock market crash. It was Sir John’s practice to leave the office just before noon to exercise, take lunch and study. When he returned, an anxious Mr. Flanagan told Sir John that the market was falling apart. Sir John took it all in stride.
“The bad news,” Mr. Flanagan remembers him saying, “is we’re in a bear market. The good news is it’s almost over. Let’s find stocks to buy.”
Added Mr. Flanagan: “Today you could see that was an obvious thing to do. At the time it was not obvious at all. To have that kind of conviction and leadership is absolutely unique.”
In his life, Sir John, a devout Presbyterian, forged a union between his progressive investment philosophy and his equally open-minded religious thought.
“I am still an enthusiastic Christian,” Sir John once said. “But why shouldn’t I try to learn more? Why shouldn’t I go to Hindu services? Why shouldn’t I go to Muslim services? If you are not egotistical, you will welcome the opportunity to learn more.” In 1972, he established the Templeton Prize, the largest annual award given to an individual. Mother Teresa received the first award in 1973. The prize, which in 2009 will be valued at 1 million pounds, or about $2 million, recognizes achievement in work that relates to science, philosophy and spirituality. Its monetary value is always more than the Nobel Prizes — Sir John’s way of demonstrating that spiritual work should not be discounted.
Sir John was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II in 1987 for his philanthropic achievements. That same year he created the foundation, which today has an endowment of about $1.5 billion and awards around $70 million in annual grants. The foundation supports research into fields of science and theology, in keeping with Sir John’s religious values and beliefs.
Let There Be Light
I am currently in Jerusalem studying at a place called Pardes (Pardes link). I thought I would write an update as to why I’m here and what I’m studying. Here is one teaching I learned this week that I thought quite profound.
The Torah and Judaism is filled with contradictions and one of the best ways to study Torah is to study those contradictions and try to wrestle with the questions of life (remember that Israel in Hebrew means “wrestles with God”).
Consider this: God creates light on the first day, saying “let there be light.” But he doesn’t create the sun, moon and the stars until the fourth day. So what light did he create on the first day?
Hold that thought.
In the Jewish morning prayers (Shacharit), there is a prayer that thanks God for renewing the world and creating anew every day. Yet in Ecclesiastes, it says there is “nothing new under the sun.” So if there is nothing new under the sun, then how can God create new things every day?
And this is where my study begins by taking disparate, contradictory statements and exploring what each one means and what Rabbis for the past two thousand years have thought and said.
Rav Kook, the first Rabbi of British Palestine, wrote that the two statements are not contradictory because Ecclesiastes only refers to what happens under the sun. What does that mean?
And now we need to go back to my first statement about the light God created on the first day. There are many Rabbinic commentaries that teach that the first light was divine wisdom. My interpretation of Rav Kook’s comments are that when you use that divine wisdom for good and compassion you go back to Day One of creation. You become partners with God to create the world and renew things again, because you aren’t under the sun, the sun hasn’t been created yet. You are before the sun, greater than the sun and the light you bring forth in the world helps renew and create the world in which we live.
Now that is a powerful philosophy by which to live your life and this is why I’m studying in Jerusalem at Pardes.
Shabbat Shalom.